![]() Russell Vose, the climate analysis group director for NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information, told USA TODAY the data collected from its thousands of observing stations are monitored and corrected accordingly. These siting standards require the stations to be located 100 feet away from any paved or concrete surfaces and in an openly ventilated area, among other requirements.īut experts say this finding is flawed on a number of levels. Watts said those 96% failed to meet the NOAA's proper siting standards. He looked at 1,083 stations in 2009 and another 128 in 2022, then combined the data from both to reach the 96% figure. The 96% figure is based on analyzing the location of those climate stations, said Anthony Watts, the author of both studies. That includes about 5,000 stations that gather climate data. The study examined NOAA's Cooperative Observer Program (COOP) stations, a network of volunteers who gather and report data on daily temperatures and precipitation. But the group's analysis of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration data wasn't anywhere near as comprehensive as the study's title and the post in question claim. It's a follow-up to a survey performed in 2009. The Instagram post references a 2022 study published by the Heartland Institute, a conservative think tank. Study had limited scope, most data from 2009 No other types of climate data collection methods or environmental organizations were discussed in the study. The 96% claim drastically overstates the scope of a study that examined one type of data collected by one agency, then only analyzed a fraction of that data in two groups 13 years apart. The post garnered more than 500 likes in nine days.įollow us on Facebook! Like our page to get updates throughout the day on our latest debunks Our rating: False "Breaking: 96% of 'climate change' data is corrupted: Heartland Institute study," reads the on-screen text. Watch Video: Extreme heat, a climate change wake-up call for many The claim: 96% of climate data is corruptedĪ July 26 Instagram post ( direct link, archive link) claims a study proves climate change data is unreliable.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |